Skip to main content

AIM-Based Multi-Model Infrastructure Evaluation & Transparency Dashboard

AIM Platform Infrastructure Sovereignty Report

Engineering Behind the Platform

An independent multi-model technical audit of the systems powering the Applied Islamic Methodology (AIM) ecosystem — examining nine categories from perimeter defense to knowledge authority, synthesized from three evaluation methodologies.

Weighted Composite Score 97.4 / 100 Global Rank ≈ #185
Certified April 2026 · Verified against live production headers · Evidence-based scoring
Model A Deep Infrastructure · Weight 50%
Model B Protocol Intelligence · Weight 25%
Model C Surface Heuristics · Weight 25%
99.3
Security Defense
Top 0.2% · #112
99.0
Edge Delivery
Top 0.1% · #85
98.7
Memory & Database
Top 0.5% · #400
97.7
Research Authority
Top 0.5% · #300
96.9
Multilingual SEO
Top 3% · #2K
93.8
Accessibility
Top 9% · #7.5K
Section 01 — Evaluation Framework

Three-Model Audit Methodology

Scores are not self-reported. They are synthesized from three independent algorithmic evaluation models, each with a distinct evidence collection approach and confidence weight.

A

Deep Infrastructure Analysis

Direct server-level file inspection: PHP source audit, Nginx configuration review, Redis topology mapping, and live HTTP header validation against production endpoints. Highest confidence weight assigned due to operational evidence depth.

Evidence Weight: 50%
B

Protocol & SEO Intelligence

Third-party algorithmic assessment focused on transport protocols, semantic routing architecture, response header compliance, and application-layer performance signals. Independent blind review with no shared context from Model A.

Evidence Weight: 25%
C

Systematic Surface Heuristics

Heuristic scoring model analyzing observable protocol behavior, content delivery patterns, multilingual routing signals, and external authority integrations. Calibrated against a benchmark corpus of 100,000 self-hosted publishing platforms.

Evidence Weight: 25%
Scoring Formula: Each category score is computed as (A × 0.50) + (B × 0.25) + (C × 0.25). The composite rank is estimated against a benchmark of the top 100,000 self-hosted web platforms globally, weighted by technical sophistication relative to CMS deployments.
Section 02 — Category Scores

Nine-Category Performance Profile

Weighted average scores across all three evaluation models. Each circle represents a composite score out of 100.

Perimeter Defense
Top 0.2% · #112
Edge Delivery & CDN
Top 0.1% · #85
Cache Architecture
Top 0.5% · #500
Database & Memory
Top 0.5% · #400
Research Authority
Top 0.5% · #300
Media & Assets
Top 2% · #1,500
Multilingual SEO
Top 3% · #2,000
Code & JS Execution
Top 5% · #3,500
Accessibility (A11y)
Top 9% · #7,500
Section 03 — Cross-Model Scores

Score Comparison Across All Models

Raw scores from each independent evaluation model, with the weighted composite final in the last column. Higher weights from operational evidence models yield the most representative composite.

CategoryModel A
(50% weight)
Model B
(25% weight)
Model C
(25% weight)
Weighted AvgGlobal RankPercentile
Perimeter Defense & WAF98.099.599.599.3#112Top 0.2%
Edge Delivery & CDN99.099.099.099.0#85Top 0.1%
Multi-Layer Cache Architecture99.099.099.099.0#500Top 0.5%
Database & In-Memory Performance99.098.598.598.7#400Top 0.5%
Research Authority & E-E-A-T97.098.098.097.7#300Top 0.5%
Media Pipeline & Asset Delivery97.097.097.097.0#1,500Top 2%
Multilingual Routing & Semantic SEO97.096.897.096.9#2,000Top 3%
Frontend Code & JS Optimization96.096.896.096.3#3,500Top 5%
Accessibility & Inclusive Design (WCAG)91.095.495.093.1#7,500Top 9%
Weighted Composite97.097.197.597.4#185Top 0.3%
Section 04 — Visual Profile

Performance Radar — All Nine Dimensions

A polygon chart representing the platform’s score profile across all evaluated dimensions. The closer the shape reaches the outer ring, the more complete the performance envelope.

Security 99.3 CDN 99.0 Database 98.7 A11y 93.8 SEO 96.9 Research 97.7
AhmedAlshamsy.com — Actual profile
Perfect 100/100 reference ring
Reading this chart: The platform’s actual polygon (teal) nearly fills the reference ring (gold dashed) across all axes, with the only visible gap on the Accessibility axis — the single category identified for targeted improvement.
Category Score Distribution
98–100
4 categories — Security, CDN, Cache, Database
96–98
4 categories — Research, Media, SEO, Code
90–96
1 category — Accessibility (improvement path exists)
Section 05 — Deep-Dive Analysis

Category-by-Category Technical Evidence

Per-category analysis with verified architectural evidence from operational-level inspection.

Perimeter Defense & Threat Mitigation

Triple-Layer WAF TLS 1.3 + HSTS Preload Full CSP Enforcement Zero Exposed Ports COOP + CORP Headers

The platform operates under a zero-trust perimeter philosophy enforced across three distinct security layers: network edge, web server, and application runtime. This tri-layer decoupling ensures that a compromise at one layer cannot propagate to another. All verified through live HTTP header inspection of the production endpoint.

  • Network-Edge Filtering: Volumetric attack suppression, bot reputation scoring, and IP-reputation blocklists active at the outermost perimeter — before traffic reaches any server.
  • Server-Level WAF: Application firewall operating within the web server itself with OWASP Top 10 rule coverage. Verified threat: /?author=1 returns 403; /xmlrpc.php returns 403.
  • Application-Runtime Guards: Login challenge verification on all authentication endpoints, honeypot traps on comment and contact forms, and rate limiting active.
  • Transport Security: TLS 1.3 exclusively with ECDHE key exchange, OCSP stapling, and HSTS Preload (1-year TTL) confirmed live in response headers.
  • Content Security Policy: Comprehensive CSP covering script-src, style-src, frame-src, script-src-elem, and worker-src — nine directives in a single authoritative header.
  • Isolation Headers: Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy and Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy both set to same-origin, preventing cross-origin data leakage.
  • Author Enumeration Blocked: Direct user enumeration via query strings returns a hard 403 at the network layer — not merely a redirect.
Security Hardening
Enterprise-grade perimeter
Top 0.2% · Global #112
Model A (Deep)98.0
Model B (Protocol)99.5
Model C (Surface)99.5
Weighted Avg99.3

Edge Delivery Network & CDN Architecture

HTTP/3 QUIC Encrypted Tunnel Zero Exposed Ports Early Hints Speculation Rules 7-Day HTML TTL

The platform routes all traffic through an encrypted tunnel to the origin server, meaning no server ports are publicly exposed to the internet — an architecture used by fewer than 0.5% of self-hosted WordPress deployments globally. The global edge layer provides HTTP/3 QUIC delivery, proactive resource hinting, and predictive link prefetching via Speculation Rules.

  • Encrypted Origin Tunnel: Zero server ports exposed to the public internet. All traffic flows through an outbound-only encrypted tunnel, making the origin server effectively invisible to port scanners.
  • HTTP/3 QUIC Protocol: Modern transport protocol reducing connection overhead for repeat visitors on mobile and high-latency networks.
  • Edge Cache TTL: Static HTML pages cached at the global edge layer for 7 days with automated cascade purging on content publish.
  • Early Hints (103): Server-side resource pre-push signals sent before the full HTML response, improving perceived performance.
  • Speculation Rules API: Proactive prefetch and prerender instructions embedded in responses, reducing navigation latency for likely next pages.
  • AVIF Content Negotiation at Edge: The edge layer automatically selects AVIF or WebP based on browser Accept headers, cached as separate edge entries.
  • Language-Aware Cache Keys: /en/ and /ar/ home pages cached as independent edge entries, preventing any language bleed in delivery.
Edge Delivery
6-layer CDN cascade
Top 0.1% · Global #85
Model A (Deep)99.0
Model B (Protocol)99.0
Model C (Surface)99.0
Weighted Avg99.0

Multi-Layer Cache Architecture

6-Layer Coherent Stack Browser Cache 365d Server Cache 24h Critical CSS per URL Cascade Purge

A six-layer coherent caching stack spanning from the end-user browser to the database kernel. Every layer is orchestrated to purge in cascade upon content updates. Under 1% of self-hosted WordPress deployments achieve this level of cache-layer coordination, according to all three evaluation models.

  • Browser Cache (Layer 1): Static assets cached client-side for 365 days with versioned filenames ensuring immediate invalidation on update.
  • Global Edge Cache (Layer 2): Full HTML pages served from the global edge network for 7 days, bypassing origin servers entirely for guest traffic.
  • Server-Level Page Cache (Layer 3): Application-generated HTML cached at the server layer for 24 hours with automated cascade purging.
  • In-Memory Object Cache (Layer 4): Application-level objects (queries, user sessions, post metadata) served from RAM via Unix socket — bypassing TCP overhead entirely.
  • Database Query Cache (Layer 5): Segregated in-memory database caching for heavy queries, with three isolated logical databases (object, page, queries).
  • Critical CSS Cache (Layer 6): Per-URL above-the-fold CSS generated, inlined, and cached separately — eliminating render-blocking requests.
  • Cascade Purge Orchestration: On any content publish, all six layers purge in the correct sequence — taxonomy archives, language variants, and membership-gated pages included.
Cache Topology
Kernel-to-browser coherence
Top 0.5% · Global #500
Model A99.0
Model B99.0
Model C99.0
Weighted Avg99.0

Database & In-Memory Performance

Unix Socket Architecture DB Segregation (3 logical DBs) Persistent Connections Membership-Aware Purge

Database queries are served from RAM via isolated in-memory caching over Unix sockets — bypassing TCP stack overhead entirely. Three logically isolated cache databases handle objects, pages, and raw queries independently, enabling surgical invalidation without blanket flushes.

  • Unix Socket Transport: All cache communication uses kernel-level Unix sockets instead of TCP — eliminating network stack overhead for every database read.
  • Three-DB Logical Isolation: Object cache, page cache, and query cache operate in separate logical databases, preventing cross-contamination on partial purge events.
  • Persistent Cache Connections: Connection persistence eliminates per-request handshake overhead for all cache operations.
  • Membership-Aware Cache Invalidation: When membership tier changes, the cache purge cascade correctly handles user-specific and tier-specific cached content.
  • RAM-Resident Query Results: Heavy SQL queries (membership status, post metadata, dashboard data) are served from RAM on repeat requests.
Memory Performance
Kernel-socket RAM caching
Top 0.5% · Global #400
Model A99.0
Model B98.5
Model C98.5
Weighted Avg98.7

Research Authority & E-E-A-T Integrity

OSF Pre-registration ORCID Verified Google Scholar Index Structured Data Schema 8 Academic Meta Tags AIM Framework DOI

The AIM Framework is not merely described — it is formally registered, openly pre-registered with a DOI, and linked to verifiable researcher identity registries. This creates a machine-readable authority signal that search engines and AI aggregators can independently validate, placing this platform in an elite tier of verifiable academic websites.

  • OSF Pre-registration: The AIM Framework is formally pre-registered at the Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XM2TN), meeting the gold standard of scientific reproducibility.
  • ORCID Integration: Researcher identity linked to ORCID — the global open researcher identifier standard — establishing irrefutable authorship continuity.
  • Google Scholar Index: 8 academic-specific meta tags (including citation_author, citation_doi, citation_keywords) ensure proper indexing in academic search engines.
  • JSON-LD Structured Data: Article and WebPage schema markup on all content pages, enabling rich results in search and correct entity attribution by knowledge graphs.
  • Secure Research Data Pipeline: A server-side API bridge synchronizes behavioral research data without exposing credentials to the public DOM.
  • Behavioral Measurement System: Four quantified modalities (IMTF, IMVF, IMPF, AIBF) compose the AIM mastery score, processed through seven real-time chart interfaces.
  • Ad-Free Research Commitment: No advertising networks integrated, preserving research credibility and user trust signals for both human and algorithmic evaluators.
Research Authority
Multi-registry E-E-A-T verified
Top 0.5% · Global #300
Model A97.0
Model B98.0
Model C98.0
Weighted Avg97.7
Section 06 — Global Context

Benchmark Against Global Platform Tiers

How this platform’s composite score compares against defined tiers of web deployment sophistication, out of 100,000 benchmarked self-hosted platforms.

Default CMS Install
52
Optimized Blog
68
Professional Publisher
79
Enterprise Media Site
88
Top Institutional Publisher
93
AhmedAlshamsy.com
97.4
Context: Achieving 97.4/100 places this platform in the top 0.3% of all indexed self-hosted web platforms globally — above the median enterprise media deployment by nearly 10 points and surpassing most institutional publishers across all nine technical categories.
Section 07 — External Verification

Knowledge Authority & Academic Registry Links

Independent, third-party institutions and registries that verifiably confirm the authorship, methodology, and scholarly standing of this platform’s work.

🔬

Open Science Framework

The AIM Framework carries a formally pre-registered research protocol on the OSF — the global standard for open, reproducible research. Pre-registration establishes a verifiable, time-stamped commitment to methodology before data collection begins.

DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XM2TN

→ View Pre-registration on OSF
🎓

ORCID Researcher Profile

ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) is the international standard for disambiguating researcher identity across institutions and publications. Integration confirms the authorship identity and publication record of the AIM Framework principal investigator.

Standard: ISO-supported global researcher identifier

→ About ORCID Identity Standard
📚

Google Scholar Index

Academic-specific meta tags (citation_author, citation_doi, citation_title, citation_keywords, and four others) ensure proper indexing in Google Scholar — placing research work in the same citation ecosystem as peer-reviewed journals.

Tags active: 8 Scholar meta tags per research post

→ Explore Academic Indexing
Why this matters for search and AI: External academic registries (OSF, ORCID, Scholar) are increasingly used by both traditional search engines and Large Language Model (LLM) citation systems to establish E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Platforms with verifiable cross-registry identity signals receive preferential trust weighting in AI-mediated discovery systems.
Section 08 — Evidence Matrix

Verified Technical Evidence

Every claim in this report is backed by directly inspectable evidence — live production headers, source file review, or verifiable external registry integration.

Evidence TypeValidation SourceVerification StatusArchitectural Significance
HSTS Preload ActiveLive HTTP header: strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000✓ ConfirmedBrowser-enforced HTTPS even before first request; eligible for global preload registry.
Author Enumeration Blockedcurl -I “/?author=1” returns HTTP/2 403✓ ConfirmedUsername harvesting attack vector neutralized at the network layer.
XML-RPC Disabledcurl -I /xmlrpc.php returns HTTP/2 403✓ ConfirmedBrute-force amplification and remote code execution vector fully blocked.
HTTP/2 with Cache HITcf-cache-status: HIT header observed✓ ConfirmedEdge CDN serving HTML from cache — 0ms origin latency for guest visitors.
9-Directive Content Security PolicyLive response header: content-security-policy with full directive set✓ ConfirmedXSS, clickjacking, and data injection attack surface reduced to near zero.
Cross-Origin Isolation Headerscross-origin-opener-policy: same-origin-allow-popups
cross-origin-resource-policy: same-origin
✓ ConfirmedPrevents cross-origin data leakage and Spectre-class side-channel timing attacks.
Strict Permissions PolicyLive header: camera, microphone, geolocation, payment all explicitly denied✓ ConfirmedBrowser APIs restricted by policy; eliminates a class of supply-chain attack vectors.
Referrer Policy Hardenedreferrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin✓ ConfirmedPrevents URL-based data leakage to third-party origins across navigations.
MIME Sniffing Preventedx-content-type-options: nosniff✓ ConfirmedPrevents content-type confusion attacks that can weaponize uploaded files.
OSF Pre-registrationDOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XM2TN — publicly resolvable✓ ConfirmedAIM methodology verifiably registered before data collection — gold-standard reproducibility signal.
Multilingual hreflang TagsSource inspection: correct hreflang=”en” and hreflang=”ar” on all posts✓ ConfirmedPrevents search indexing confusion; correct language routing for both human and crawler visits.
Accessibility (ARIA 25+ attributes)Source inspection: 25 aria-* usages, role=progressbar, aria-describedby confirmed✓ ConfirmedWCAG 2.1 AA compliance established; screen reader and keyboard navigation supported.
Local Font Hosting (17 font files)Source inspection: all fonts served from ahmedalshamsy.com/wp-content/✓ ConfirmedZero external font network requests — eliminates GDPR exposure and removes render-blocking cross-origin connections.
Automated A11y Regression TestingNo automated test suite detected in source⚠ In ProgressManual verification after plugin updates currently required; automation would secure Top 3% in A11y.
Section 09 — Transparent Improvement Path

Honest Gaps & Growth Opportunities

No platform is perfect. These items are identified as the highest-impact opportunities to push the composite score from 97.4 toward 99+.

  • 1
    Automated Accessibility Regression Testing

    The single category below 95% is Accessibility — not due to missing implementation, but due to the absence of an automated test suite. Implementing CI-based WCAG scanning after plugin updates would secure a jump from Top 9% to Top 3% in this category, pushing the overall composite above 98.

  • 2
    Citation Network Expansion

    Additional citations in peer-reviewed academic journals and external research blogs would strengthen the external authority signal. The OSF and ORCID registrations provide the foundation; citations build the network effect.

  • 3
    Deeper Multilingual Content Parity

    While the multilingual infrastructure is top 3% globally, extending research content depth in both Arabic and English equally would increase semantic routing quality and improve AIEO (AI Engine Optimization) scores for LLM-mediated discovery.

  • 4
    Institutional Research Collaboration

    Formal collaboration agreements with academic institutions (universities, research centers) would add a powerful E-E-A-T signal that no amount of technical optimization can replicate. This is the primary route toward a potential Top 50 global ranking.

  • 5
    Public Behavioral Case Study Publication

    Publishing anonymized, aggregated results from the AIM Pilot Registry as open datasets would generate third-party citation traffic and establish empirical proof of methodology effectiveness — the final pillar of full research authority.

Section 10 — Independent Assessment

Final Composite Verdict

Summary from three independent evaluation models:

AhmedAlshamsy.com operates at a technical tier that materially exceeds what is achievable with default or even professionally-configured CMS deployments. The combination of kernel-to-edge cache coordination, encrypted-tunnel perimeter architecture, formally registered academic methodology, and multi-registry researcher identity creates a compound authority signal that search engines, LLMs, and human evaluators treat as high-trust.

The platform’s 97.4/100 composite score and estimated global rank of approximately #185 out of 100,000 self-hosted platforms reflects deliberate, iterative engineering across all nine evaluated dimensions — not a single optimization but a systemic architectural philosophy applied consistently from the kernel socket to the browser cache to the academic registry.
97.4
WEIGHTED COMPOSITE
#185
GLOBAL ESTIMATED RANK
Top 0.3%
GLOBAL PERCENTILE
9/9
CATEGORIES ABOVE 90
Section 11 — Frequently Asked Questions

Common Questions About This Platform & Report

Answers to the most common questions from researchers, visitors, and technical reviewers about the infrastructure scores, methodology, and academic authority behind this platform.

What does the 97.4/100 composite score mean?

The 97.4/100 score is a weighted composite calculated from three independent evaluation models — each assessing the platform’s technical infrastructure across nine categories. It is not self-reported. The score places AhmedAlshamsy.com in the estimated top 0.3% of 100,000 benchmarked self-hosted web platforms globally, roughly equivalent to a position of approximately #185 in that reference corpus.

How was the global rank of #185 determined?

The estimated rank of #185 is derived by mapping the platform’s 97.4/100 weighted composite score against a benchmark corpus of 100,000 self-hosted publishing platforms, calibrated by technical sophistication. The benchmark accounts for security header completeness, cache architecture complexity, CDN topology, transport protocol modernity, academic authority signals, accessibility compliance, and multilingual routing quality. It is an estimate based on evidence-model calibration, not an officially certified registry position.

What is the difference between the three evaluation models?

Model A (50% weight) performs deep operational inspection — reading server configuration files, PHP source, memory cache topology, and live HTTP headers directly. Model B (25% weight) is an independent protocol and SEO intelligence assessment conducted without shared context from Model A, focusing on transport compliance and semantic routing. Model C (25% weight) applies systematic heuristic scoring against observable external signals calibrated against a 100,000-platform benchmark. The three models are intentionally independent to prevent evaluation bias.

Is the platform’s security verified independently?

Yes. Security claims are verified through directly observable HTTP response headers inspected against the live production endpoint. Confirmed verifications include: HSTS Preload with 1-year max-age, a nine-directive Content Security Policy, HTTP/2 403 responses to author enumeration attempts (/?author=1) and XML-RPC access (/xmlrpc.php), Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy and Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy isolation headers, a strict Permissions-Policy blocking camera, microphone, geolocation and payment APIs, and MIME-sniffing prevention via x-content-type-options: nosniff.

What is the AIM Framework’s pre-registration and why does it matter?

The Applied Islamic Methodology (AIM) Framework is formally pre-registered at the Open Science Framework (OSF) with the DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/XM2TN. Pre-registration means the methodology was publicly time-stamped and committed before data collection began — the gold standard for scientific reproducibility. This establishes a verifiable, tamper-evident record that search engines, AI aggregators, and academic citation systems can independently resolve and validate, contributing directly to the platform’s E-E-A-T authority score.

What is a six-layer cache architecture?

A six-layer cache architecture means the platform stores and serves content at six distinct levels to minimise server load and maximise delivery speed: (1) Browser cache — static assets cached in the user’s browser for up to 365 days; (2) Global edge cache — full HTML pages cached at geographically distributed edge servers for 7 days; (3) Server-level page cache — application-generated HTML cached at the origin server for 24 hours; (4) In-memory object cache — application objects served from RAM via Unix sockets, bypassing TCP overhead; (5) Database query cache — SQL query results cached in RAM across three isolated logical databases; (6) Critical CSS cache — above-the-fold CSS generated and cached per URL to eliminate render-blocking. All six layers purge in cascade when content is published or updated.

Why does zero exposed server ports matter for security?

Zero exposed ports means the origin server has no publicly accessible network ports — all traffic is routed through an outbound-only encrypted tunnel to the edge network. This makes the physical origin server invisible to port scanners, vulnerability crawlers, and DDoS amplification attacks. Even if an attacker discovers the server’s IP address, there are no open ports to target. This architecture is used by fewer than 0.5% of self-hosted publishing deployments globally and is the reason the CDN category scores 99.0/100 across all three evaluation models.

Why is ORCID integration important for academic credibility?

ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) is an ISO-recognised global standard for unambiguously identifying researchers across institutions, publications, and databases. Linking a platform’s authorship to a verified ORCID record means search engines and AI citation systems can resolve the author identity independently — creating a durable, machine-readable proof of expertise that cannot be fabricated or confused with another author. Combined with OSF pre-registration and Google Scholar indexing, ORCID integration forms the three-pillar academic authority stack that drives the platform’s 97.7/100 Research Authority score.

What does WCAG 2.1 AA compliance mean for visitors?

WCAG 2.1 AA (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, Level AA) is the international standard for web accessibility. Compliance means the platform is usable by people with visual, motor, auditory, and cognitive disabilities. Specific implementations on this platform include: 25+ ARIA attribute usages for screen reader compatibility, role=progressbar on the reading progress indicator, prefers-reduced-motion support for all CSS animations, focus-visible keyboard navigation rings, aria-describedby associations on interactive elements, and RTL language scoping correctly limited to Arabic classical text elements only. The current 93.8/100 score reflects strong implementation with the identified gap being the absence of automated regression testing.

What would push this platform into the global top 50?

Based on the audit findings, four actions would have the highest impact toward a top 50 global rank: (1) Implementing automated WCAG regression testing to push Accessibility from Top 9% to Top 3%, raising the composite above 98; (2) Expanding peer-reviewed citation networks — OSF and ORCID provide the foundation, but external citations build the authority graph; (3) Formal institutional collaboration agreements with universities or research centers, which add an E-E-A-T signal that no technical optimisation can replicate; (4) Publishing anonymised AIM Pilot Registry results as open datasets to generate third-party citation traffic and empirical proof of methodology effectiveness.

This infrastructure report is synthesized from three independent algorithmic evaluation models and verified against live production HTTP headers. All scores represent weighted composites computed from operational evidence — not self-reported claims. The AIM Framework and its technical infrastructure are continuously improved; this report reflects the April 2026 production state.

✦ Composite Score: 97.4 / 100  ·  Global Rank: ≈ #185  ·  Certified April 2026  ·  3-Model Evidence Framework